<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensible Post on New Orphan Works Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/</link>
	<description>Jon Phillips is a developer living in San Francisco and Beijing while growing open production company Fabricatorz and Aiki Framework. His notable involvements include Open Source and Free Culture movements, Inkscape, Open Clip Art Library, Creative Commons, Status.Net, Sharism, and Qi Hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 06:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant</title>
		<link>http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-95412</link>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rejon.org/?p=754#comment-95412</guid>
		<description>I assume you are joking when you call a post by the archetype anti-copyright group Public Knowledge &quot;sensible&quot; right?  That&#039;s like holding a discussion on cosmetic testing on animals and then linking to PETA&#039;s &quot;review&quot; of the issue.  How could you possibly think a group like PK who wants to remove copyright protection across the board could possibly say anything &quot;sensible&quot; on the OW issue.  At least link to someone like ASMP or someone similar that has a middle of the road position.  Geez... talk about a &quot;not sensible&quot; link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you are joking when you call a post by the archetype anti-copyright group Public Knowledge &#8220;sensible&#8221; right?  That&#8217;s like holding a discussion on cosmetic testing on animals and then linking to PETA&#8217;s &#8220;review&#8221; of the issue.  How could you possibly think a group like PK who wants to remove copyright protection across the board could possibly say anything &#8220;sensible&#8221; on the OW issue.  At least link to someone like ASMP or someone similar that has a middle of the road position.  Geez&#8230; talk about a &#8220;not sensible&#8221; link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

