<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensible Post on New Orphan Works Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/</link>
	<description>Jon Phillips is a developer living in San Francisco and Beijing while growing Fabricatorz.com and &#34;new&#34; media projects. His notable involvements include Open Source and Free Culture movements, Inkscape, Open Clip Art Library, and building Status.Net.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant</title>
		<link>http://rejon.org/2008/04/sensible-post-on-new-orphan-works-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-95412</link>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rejon.org/?p=754#comment-95412</guid>
		<description>I assume you are joking when you call a post by the archetype anti-copyright group Public Knowledge &quot;sensible&quot; right?  That&#039;s like holding a discussion on cosmetic testing on animals and then linking to PETA&#039;s &quot;review&quot; of the issue.  How could you possibly think a group like PK who wants to remove copyright protection across the board could possibly say anything &quot;sensible&quot; on the OW issue.  At least link to someone like ASMP or someone similar that has a middle of the road position.  Geez... talk about a &quot;not sensible&quot; link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you are joking when you call a post by the archetype anti-copyright group Public Knowledge &#8220;sensible&#8221; right?  That&#8217;s like holding a discussion on cosmetic testing on animals and then linking to PETA&#8217;s &#8220;review&#8221; of the issue.  How could you possibly think a group like PK who wants to remove copyright protection across the board could possibly say anything &#8220;sensible&#8221; on the OW issue.  At least link to someone like ASMP or someone similar that has a middle of the road position.  Geez&#8230; talk about a &#8220;not sensible&#8221; link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

